We are here for you

If you are looking to find a solicitor who specialises in criminal law you have come to the right place. Erica Peat & Diable Solicitors are a London based firm providing a high quality service to all our clients across England and Wales.

Our solicitors provide quality advice on all aspects of criminal law, including advice at the police station, trial preparation and representation at court, appeals and prison law.

All of our solicitors are members of the Law Society, regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and have been accredited as providing top quality criminal law advice by the Criminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme, which is awarded by the Law Society to solicitors who have proven their skill in criminal law. A number of our solicitors are also qualified barristers, meaning that as well as being specialist criminal law solicitors they are also expert advocates.  Put it all together and what you get from us is a top quality service coupled with truly expert legal advice and representation.

When you instruct us we will find a solicitor from within our firm who has the right mix of skills and experience to handle your case, they will examine all of the evidence in your case, advise you on the evidence and the best tactics to win your case. We will match your case to the best barrister for your case. Together, your legal team will work with you using their specialist legal skills to provide you with the best quality defence available.

We will fight to win your case.

Contact one of our friendly, helpful, expert solicitors today by calling 020 8533 7999 or send us your details from our contact us page and we will call you back as soon as possible.

Below are the latest posts from our blog.

Prison officer cleared over death of prisoner

EPD today scored another great success as our client was cleared by a jury at Isleworth Crown Court over his role in the death of an inmate on the segregation unit last year.

M had been accused of malfeasance in public or judicial office after prison official accused him of fabricating prison records at HMP Wormwood Scrubs when he was left in charge of the segregation unit – a part of the prison where the most violent and dangerous prisoners are housed, usually following a major incident that has forced the prison to segregate the prisoners.

The prosecution said that M had a duty to ensure the welfare and safety of the inmates under his supervision and that he had failed in that duty by deliberately failing to check on the deceased prisoner for several hours as the man was hanging from the bars of his window by a bed sheet wrapped around his neck.

EPD argued that M had been left alone in a difficult environment with little or no training to do a job that was several pay grades above his position.  We argued that he had been badly let down by the Prison Service and that far from failing in his duty, M had been dealing with another prisoner who had also attempted to kill himself and had spent a considerable amount of time speaking with him.

On the afternoon of the 27th April 2012, the jury unanimously acquitted M.

When he heard the verdict, M was so relieved that he wept briefly before collapsing in the dock.  He was rushed to hospital by ambulance.

Posted in Crown Court, Homicide, Trial | Leave a comment

Sussex police clamp down on speeding drivers

Consider yourselves warned: Sussex police will be clamping down on drivers speeding through the county over the coming week.

Police will be targeting speeding motorists

The police have said that they are doing this to cut deaths and serious injuries on the road rather than just catch more people speeding.  Sergeant Phil Duffy of Sussex Police Road Policing Unit said: “Speed is one of the biggest factors in accidents on our roads. Throughout the week officers will be stopping speeding drivers to enforce the law... Driving too fast for the road or the weather conditions is extremely dangerous and is a major contributory factor to many collisions. Speeding could also end up in you seriously injuring or even killing yourself or others.

The police will have met with the chairman of the local magistrates bench to discuss Operation Crackdown before it began so, given the emphasis on death and injury, you can expect the courts to be taking an extra dim view of speeding over the coming month or two.

Posted in Motoring law, Speeding | Leave a comment

Great sentence on serious fraud case

Last week in the case of R v KJ, EPD Solicitors fraud team scored a fantastic result in a serious allegation of fraud against one of our clients.

KJ had admitted the offence to police before contacting EPD Solicitors.  KJ was a trusted senior employee of Lloyds TSB bank.  KJ used the banks computer systems to create fake bank accounts on the Lloyds’ computers and then trawled the bank’s records for dormant bank accounts.  Because KJ had very high clearance to work on accounts he changed the addresses on the accounts to prevent the owners receiving further statements.  Once completed, he would transfer the contents of the account into one of his fake accounts from whence he further transferred the money into accounts he had set up with other banks.

In this way KJ was able to obtain large amounts of money over a considerable period of time.

The sentencing guidelines suggested that for an offence conducted over a long period of time, involving a large amount of stolen money and carried out in very serious breach of trust, an immediate prison sentence of up to five years was appropriate.

KJ confessed to police before contacting EPD’s fraud team.  He entered a guilty plea at the City of London Magistrates Court.  Appearing for sentence at the Old Bailey last week, EPD’s fraud team were able to argue that KJ should not go to prison.

The sentencing judge agreed and passed a suspended prison sentence.

Posted in Crown Court, Fraud, Magistrates Court, Sentence | Leave a comment

Plea bargaining in fraud cases

In the USA it is very common for prosecutors and defendants to discuss the case and agree on the appropriate charges and even the sentence that should be imposed up on the defendant at the conclusion of the case.  Such agreements are technically banned under English law; however, plea bargains are becoming more common in English courts where serious fraud is alleged.

If you have committed a serious fraud then entering into a plea bargain (or as the Serious Fraud Office prefers to call them plea discussions) may well be the answer for you to minimise the sentence you receive and, importantly, the impact that confiscation proceedings have upon you post-conviction.

Plea bargains are not the solution to avoiding prosecution.  The acceptance of a plea bargain by the Serious Fraud Office will only occur when you agree to plead guilty.  The benefit to the prosecution is obvious: they avoid the expense and risk of proceeding to trial.  The benefit to you is that an agreement will allow you to have some say in the fraud charges you face, the way the prosecution frame the allegations against you and the sentence you receive.  A plea bargain will also allow you to limit the damage that the confiscation proceedings have upon your wealth and assets.

The plea bargain is not binding upon the court and the judge could, in theory, reject the plea bargain completely.  However, in a recent case the court rejected the plea bargain informing the Serious Fraud Office prosecutor that they should not attempt to limit the courts powers by presenting the court with a fait accompli.  Nonetheless, the court still went on to pass the sentence that had been agreed in the plea bargain!

Plea discussions can begin before or after you have been charged and appeared in court.

It is important that you have a solicitor representing you who is well versed in fraud matters and has the necessary skills to represent you in the discussion that leads to the plea bargain.  You should have confidence that the solicitor knows how to protect your interest – this is particularly important if the plea discussions are likely to reveal previously unknown fraud offences that you have committed – your solicitor must obtain an undertaking from the Serious Fraud Office that any information revealed by you that implicates you in a previously unknown offence cannot be used against you in a court of law.

If you require advice on any aspect of financial crime then do not hesitate to contact us using our contact page or by calling 020 8533 7999.

Posted in Fraud, Plea bargain | Leave a comment

Early removal of a driving disqualification

If you have been disqualified from driving, one thing I bet neither the court nor your solicitor told you about was the possibility of making an application to have your disqualification removed early.

You may have been offered the chance to take part in a drink driving course, completion of which removes a few months from the end of your sentence.  But, this is different and has nothing to do with the driving course.  Many years ago Parliament passed legislation that allows drivers to apply to the court that disqualified them from driving for the removal of the driving ban.

Obviously, the police and courts don’t really want you to know about this legislation because if everybody knew about it then it would make a mockery of the courts power to disqualify as everybody would be applying for their driving licence back early.

The court will consider all kinds of things, including your character and your conduct after the ban was imposed, the nature of the offence as well as anything else it considers to be relevant to its decision.

This loophole in the law only applies to people who have been banned from driving for more than two-years and there are strict time limits enforced for when you can make an application.

Call EPD Solicitors now on 020 8533 7999 or send us a message on our contact page and see if we can get your driving licence back early for you.

Posted in Drink driving, Driving while disqualified, Motoring law | 1 Comment

Guide to the Court of Criminal Appeals

What is an appeal?

Where a court has made a decision that you disagree with it is often possible to appeal that decision to a higher court for a second opinion.  Where the point is very important you can appeal beyond the court of appeal to the Supreme Court and in certain cases to the European Court of Justice or the European Court of Human Rights.

This document is aimed specifically at people appealing from the Crown Court to the Court of Appeal against either conviction or sentence.  If you are interested in appealing from the magistrates’ court to the Crown Court or High Court then you should read our guide to magistrate court appeals.

Appeal against conviction

What is the Court of Appeal looking for?

Many clients come to us looking to fight their Crown Court trial over again in the Court of Appeal.  Understandably, they are upset at being convicted and wish to go over the evidence to prove their innocence.  The first thing to understand about appeals to the Court of Appeal is that they are not there to re-hear your trial and to an extent they are not there to consider whether you are guilty or innocent.

The Court of Appeal’s sole job is to consider whether your conviction is safe.

There are two general headings under which an appeal may be brought.  These are:

  1. New evidence; and
  2. Procedural irregularity.

New evidence must be something that was not available to the defence at the time of the trial.  Where new evidence is produced the court will then consider whether that evidence could have caused the jury to reach a different verdict.  If it could have you are likely to win your appeal.  If not then you lose your appeal.

A procedural irregularity means that something happened at your trial that should not have happened.  This could be almost anything from evidence being excluded or admitted unfairly to the judge making an error in his summing up.  Once you have shown the court that there was a procedural irregularity the court will consider whether the jury would have reached a different verdict had the mistake during the trial not occurred.

What is the procedure?

Appealing a conviction is not straight forward and there is a lot of red tape to be gone through before your case reaches a full Court of Appeal hearing.

It is first necessary to obtain the advice of a barrister of solicitor-advocate in favour of appealing.  In the case of a barrister, this means instructing a solicitor who specialises in appeal court cases first and then allowing the solicitor to instruct the barrister for you.  This is because most barristers are unable to accept instructions direct from members of the public.

Once you have your positive advice on appeal your solicitor-advocate or barrister will prepare your grounds of appeal.  This is a document that formally sets out why you say your conviction is unsafe.

The grounds of appeal and advice on appeal are sent to the court that convicted you along with a form that tells the court you are appealing your conviction.  The Crown Court will forward your appeal documents along with some records of their own to the Court of Appeal.

At the Court of Appeal your case will be allocated to a lawyer employed by the court who will examine the documents and prepare a summary.  At this stage he is also likely to identify various documents that the court will require, such as the transcript of the trial judge’s summing up to the jury.

Once the case summary is finished it is passed to a senior judge who is usually either a High Court judge or a Lord Justice of Appeal.  This is called the Single Judge stage.  The Single Judge will either grant you leave to appeal or will refuse leave according to whether he thinks that your appeal has a chance of succeeding.

If leave is refused by the Single Judge you can renew your application before the Full Court of Appeal.  It is important to take advice before doing this as the Full Court can direct that some of the time you have spent in prison will not count toward your sentence, which means you can end up spending longer in prison than you would have done.  Also, you must remember that this is a renewal of your application for leave to appeal.  It is not a final appeal hearing.

If leave is granted your case will be listed before the Full Court of Appeal for them to decide whether you win or lose your appeal.

What happens after my appeal?

The Court of Appeal is unlikely to overturn your conviction without ordering a re-trial.  It does happen, but it is the exception rather than the rule.

The Court of Appeal has three options when deciding your appeal.  It can:

  • Uphold the conviction – this means you lose
  • Quash the conviction
  • Quash your conviction and direct a retrial

If a retrial is ordered then you may be released on bail if you had bail before your original trial.

How long will it take?

The time taken to prepare your appeal will depend upon the amount of work that needs to be done before seeking the advice of a barrister or solicitor-advocate.  For obvious reasons, a case that requires your solicitor to employ experts to investigate and report back will take much longer than a case that turns on an error by the trial judge in his summing up.

The process at the court of appeal usually takes between 4 – 8 months depending on how busy the court is and how important they deem your appeal to be.

Typically speaking an appeal can take up to a year from start to finish, although it may take as short a time as six-months.  Exceptional cases can be much faster.

If you need a very fast service then it is worth paying privately as this removes the bureaucracy involved in obtaining funding from the Legal Services Commission, which can add months of delay to a case.  See below for more information on funding.

Appeal against sentence

When you appeal your sentence the one question the Court of Appeal will ask is whether your sentence is “manifestly excessive”.  This means that the sentence imposed is either unlawful or is so harsh as to be unjust.

The procedure is similar to that described above for appeals against conviction.

At the end of the appeal, the Court of Appeal can either refuse your appeal, which means that the original sentence imposed stands, or the judges can allow your appeal and substitute an alternative sentence in its place.

How much will an appeal cost me?

Legal aid is available for criminal appeals.  However, it is subject to a means and merits test, thus you must prove to the Legal Services Commission that your case is important enough for it to fund and that you do not have the ability to pay privately.

Legal aid in appeal cases is different from legal aid in pre-trial cases.  At the appeal stage your solicitor must apply to the Legal Services Commission for permission to undertake each and every piece of work on your case.  This is a slow process that means your solicitor wastes much of his time dealing with the LSC and waiting for permission to be granted.  It also places restrictions on how often you can meet with and talk to your solicitor.  This is particularly true if you wish to instruct an expert solicitor who happens not to be based close to you because the Legal Services Commission will not pay for your solicitor to visit you.  This means visits will take place when the solicitor can find a gap in his paid work.  Obviously, good solicitors are busy meaning that you may have to wait for a visit if you are a large distance from your solicitor’s office.

You can speed up your appeal considerably by paying privately.  The cost of this will vary depending on the complexity of the case and whether it is necessary to employ any experts to produce evidence for you.  EPD Solicitors are happy to provide a no obligation estimate.  For the best accuracy it will be necessary for us to speak with you about your appeal and for us to see the papers or at least know how much paperwork there is for us to go through.

 

If you or somebody you know needs help appealing a conviction then don’t hesitate to contact us on 020 8533 7999 and speak with one of our friendly, experienced solicitors.

Posted in Appeal, Guide, Help sheet | Leave a comment

Fighting and winning your magistrates court trial

WHAT IS A TRIAL?

A trial is a court hearing in which the court makes a decision about whether you are guilty or not guilty.
The court does this by hearing all of the evidence from the prosecution and defence, which is challenged by cross-examination, i.e. by the defence asking questions of prosecution witnesses and vice versa. If the defendant choses to give evidence then the court will listen to what he or she has to say.
They take all of that information and decide on a verdict of guilty or not guilty.

WHO WILL BE AT MY TRIAL?

  • There are a lot of people worth mentioning who are present during the trial.
  • Magistrates – either a panel of three lay magistrates or a single professional judge. These are the people who decide whether you are guilty or not guilty.
  • Prosecutor – usually an employee of the Crown Prosecution Service. Their job is to put the case for the prosecution before the magistrates court.
  • Defence – your solicitor, he or she is there to put your case to the magistrates court and help you secure an acquittal.
  • Officer in the case – the police officer who was in charge of the investigation against you. They are present to assist the prosecutor as well as give evidence in the case.
  • Witnesses – the people who saw the incident or the person who made the complaint against you all fall into this category. Witnesses can be called by the prosecution or the defence.
  • Legal advisor – sometimes known as a court clerk. This is a lawyer who sits in front of the magistrates. It is the legal advisors job to assist the magistrates with any points of law that arise during your trial.
  • Usher – an usher or list caller will usually be present at the start of the trial to ensure that everybody is in the correct place. You should make sure that the usher knows if you are calling witnesses and where the witnesses will be so they can be called into court at the appropriate time.
  • Witness services – this is an organisation that exists to make the process of giving evidence easier for witnesses. They aren’t actually in the court room, but have an office in the building. They usually deal with prosecution witnesses but only because very few defence witnesses request their services. If any of your witnesses are nervous it’s a good idea to introduce them to somebody from witness services before the trial starts.

PROCEDURE

The trial is split into three parts: the prosecution case, the defence case and the verdict.

The prosecution case begins with an opening speech and then moves into evidence from witnesses being called. They will also read out your police interview transcript and read any statements that are agreed between both sides.

The defence case will rarely involve an opening speech, meaning it moves straight into calling witnesses. The first witness to be called should always be the defendant. After that witnesses may be called in any order your solicitor sees fit. At the end of the defence case your solicitor will make a closing speech. It is very unusual for the prosecution to make a closing speech in the magistrates’ court.

After hearing all of the evidence, the court will decide whether you are guilty or not guilty.

HOW CAN I PROVE MY INNOCENCE?

It is very important that you understand you are not on trial to prove your innocence. The court will only find you guilty or not guilty, which is not the same as saying you are innocent!

If the court is sure that you committed the offence then they must convict. If the magistrates are not sure (there is some doubt in their minds) then they must acquit you, i.e. find you not guilty.

At trial it is not your job or your solicitor’s job to prove that you are innocent, only to raise sufficient doubt in the mind of the magistrates about whether you did commit the crime that you have been accused of committing.

In the Crown Court, it is very common to see men accused of sexual offences arguing that their ex-wife has put their child up to making the allegation. Their legal teams spend most of the trial arguing that the ex-wife is a liar and ignoring the evidence from the child. At EPD Solicitors, we see this a lot because these men are invariably convicted and come to us to appeal their convictions.

Once you accept that there is a difference between being innocent and not guilty you will be able to focus on the relevant points and fight the trial on those.

DO I HAVE TO FIGHT EVERYTHING THE PROSECUTION SAYS?

No. There will be points that you and the prosecution agree about. In some cases, you may even agree with everything that the prosecution says but simply contend that it does not amount to a crime.

You must take legal advice to help you focus on the points that you need to fight and ignore the points with which you agree. By doing this your case will make more sense to the magistrates and thus it will be easier for them to believe you and acquit you.

The evidence you need to fight will depend upon your specific case, which is why it is so important to speak with a solicitor well in advance of your trial.

WHAT CAN I DO TO PREPARE FOR TRIAL?

Make sure that you obtain a copy of the papers from your solicitor. Most solicitors will send you a copy of the evidence against you; however, in some circumstances the solicitor may have a policy to hand papers to you directly, for example, where you are accused of a sexual offence.

Be sure to read all of the papers thoroughly and understand what you are accused of doing. Ask your solicitor to explain the law to you. We all know what is meant by the word “theft”, but do you know what appropriation means to a court and when your appropriation of an item is sufficient for the offence of theft?

If you will be giving evidence then you should read your own police interview as well as any other statement you have given to the police to remind yourself what you said. Also, read the other statements. The prosecutor will ask you questions based upon the other statements, so make sure you know what is said and have your answers ready. A solicitor can give you helpful advice about this.

DO I NEED A SOLICITOR?

Every year approximately 90% of the people who stand trial in the magistrates court are convicted! There are no figures for how many of those were unrepresented; however, it is safe to assume that most of the 10% of cases ending in an acquittal did have legal representation.

HOW MUCH WILL MY CASE COST?

Legal aid is available in the magistrates’ court. You must prove to the Legal Services Commission that your case is serious enough to warrant public funding and that you are not able to pay for your own defence.

If you have to pay privately then the cost of you case will depend upon the seriousness of your case as that has an effect on both the amount of work that is required , the seniority of the solicitor who will undertake your case and the length of your trial.

Experience has shown us that to prepare and conduct a case properly for trial takes an experienced solicitor on average between 12 – 15 hours and costs between £1,200 – £1,800 including VAT. AT EPD Solicitors, we understand that you do not want to be paying £180 per hour with no idea how much the final bill will be, which is why we offer our services on a fixed fee basis so you know in advance how much it will cost and what you will get for your money.

Following a not guilty verdict we will make an application for a Defence Costs Order, which will allow you to claim back your legal fees and any other expenses you incurred in defending yourself from the prosecution.

Feel free to contact us for a no obligation chat about your case and how much it is likely to cost on 020 8533 7999.

Posted in Guide, Help sheet, Magistrates Court, Trial | 2 Comments

Police forced to drop driving allegations

Greater Manchester Police have been forced to drop hundreds cases where vehicle owners failed to provide details of the person driving a car under section 172 Road Traffic Act 1988.  This is because the police and Crown Prosecution Service took too long in bringing the cases before the court.

Police must bring a charge against a driver within a set time period, which is currently six-months.

Many of the charges have been brought against drivers within six-months of s. 172 reminder notices being sent but more than six-months after the original s. 172 notice was sent.  The argument that has been working in Manchester is actually quite a complicated legal point that looks at when the six-months begins to run and derives from a case in the Scottish courts of the Glasgow Procurator Fiscal v Jackson.  It is important to remember that Scottish cases do not bind English courts, so in fact the Manchester court was not required to follow the Scottish judgment.

We at EPD Solicitors don’t expect to see the police across England and Wales capitulating quite as readily as Manchester police seem to have done.  We do expect that, once police officers have received some quality legal advice from their own lawyers, we will see police forces fighting to prevent cases being thrown out of court.  This is particularly likely to be true in areas like London and Thames Valley, which both have strong motoring law prosecution departments.

As every you can contact EPD Solicitors to speak with one of our expert solicitors and get the quality advice that you will need if you wish to fight any type of road traffic allegation.

Posted in Motoring law, Speeding | 1 Comment

New drug sentencing guidelines

Following a review of sentencing by the Sentencing Guidelines Council, new rules for the sentencing of drug offences have been issued to all courts in England and Wales.

Then new guidelines breakdown drugs into the usual Class A, B and C but then subdivide each class of drugs to provide sentence starting points based upon the seriousness of the offenders behaviour.  This is most notable in possession with intent to supply and cases of actual supply of drugs.  The new guidelines ask how involved the offender was in the drug supply chain and then provides sentences based upon their involvement.

The most serious offences see sentences increase, while those at the very bottom end stay more or less the same as before.

The new guidelines have already caused some confusion in court.  In at least one case we are aware of an experienced District Judge in London erroneously assigned an offender to a much higher category than he otherwise would have been and informed him that he faced a sentence of 18 months imprisonment.  The judge committed the case for sentence.

This highlights the importance of obtaining quality legal advice from a specialist solicitor.

Posted in Drugs | 2 Comments